El Salvador vs Republic of Korea: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, annual

El Salvador
0.3152 % change on previous year
in 2019
Republic of Korea
0.3043 % change on previous year
in 2019
El Salvador rank
113th
Republic of Korea rank
114th

Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, annual over time

  • El Salvador
  • Republic of Korea
-20-1001020196219902019

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.3152 % change on previous year against 0.3043 % change on previous year in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.0109 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 28 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1962 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 113th and Republic of Korea ranks 114th of 195 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Korea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 3.24 % change on previous year 4.08 % change on previous year 0.843 % change on previous year Republic of Korea
1970s 2.41 % change on previous year 3.33 % change on previous year 0.9185 % change on previous year Republic of Korea
1980s -0.1446 % change on previous year 1.51 % change on previous year 1.66 % change on previous year Republic of Korea
1990s 0.3504 % change on previous year -0.3644 % change on previous year 0.7148 % change on previous year El Salvador
2000s 1.89 % change on previous year -1.89 % change on previous year 3.78 % change on previous year El Salvador
2010s -2.78 % change on previous year 0.4026 % change on previous year 3.18 % change on previous year Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, annual, El Salvador or Republic of Korea?
El Salvador, at 0.3152 % change on previous year against 0.3043 % change on previous year in Republic of Korea as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, annual between El Salvador and Republic of Korea?
0.0109 % change on previous year, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Republic of Korea?
58 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2019.
How do El Salvador and Republic of Korea rank globally for emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, annual?
El Salvador ranks 113th and Republic of Korea ranks 114th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Republic of Korea: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-direct-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-annual-growth-rate/el-salvador/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-direct-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-annual-growth-rate/el-salvador/korea-rep/">El Salvador vs Republic of Korea: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 10,196 data points, 1962–2019
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.