Central African Republic vs Malawi: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - AFOLU

Central African Republic
12.95
in 2050
Malawi
12.25
in 2050
Central African Republic rank
68th
Malawi rank
71st

Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - AFOLU over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Malawi
2.557.51012.5199020202050

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 12.95 against 12.25 in Malawi, a difference of 0.7.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 68th and Malawi ranks 71st of 195 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 4.18 2.38 1.8 Central African Republic
2000s 5.53 3.5 2.02 Central African Republic
2010s 7.39 6.35 1.04 Central African Republic
2030s 10.15 7.42 2.73 Central African Republic
2050s 12.95 12.25 0.7024 Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - afolu, Central African Republic or Malawi?
Central African Republic, at 12.95 against 12.25 in Malawi as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - afolu between Central African Republic and Malawi?
0.7, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Malawi?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2050.
How do Central African Republic and Malawi rank globally for emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - afolu?
Central African Republic ranks 68th and Malawi ranks 71st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - AFOLU. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Malawi: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - AFOLU. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-direct-emissions-n2o-afolu/central-african-republic/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-direct-emissions-n2o-afolu/central-african-republic/malawi/">Central African Republic vs Malawi: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - AFOLU</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - AFOLU
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
197 places, 6,123 data points, 1990–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).