South Sudan vs United States: Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre
South Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
United States
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan rank
101st
United States rank
98th
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre over time
- South Sudan
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
Across all 8 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 101st and United States ranks 98th of 193 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - afolu, per square kilometre, South Sudan or United States?
- United States, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - afolu, per square kilometre between South Sudan and United States?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and United States?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do South Sudan and United States rank globally for emission totals - direct emissions (n2o) - afolu, per square kilometre?
- South Sudan ranks 101st and United States ranks 98th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - AFOLU, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - AFOLU divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.