Jordan vs Namibia: Elite Consultations Score
Jordan
1.38
in 2025
Namibia
1.35
in 2025
Jordan rank
53rd
Namibia rank
56th
Elite Consultations Score over time
- Jordan
- Namibia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 1.38 against 1.35 in Namibia, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 56th of 176 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 7 and Namibia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.282 | -1.61 | 1.89 | Jordan |
| 1930s | 0.282 | -1.39 | 1.67 | Jordan |
| 1940s | 0.3276 | -1.39 | 1.72 | Jordan |
| 1950s | 0.7219 | -1.39 | 2.11 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 0.6058 | -1.39 | 1.99 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0.205 | -1.32 | 1.52 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 0.5052 | -0.625 | 1.13 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 1.18 | 2.31 | 1.13 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.74 | 1.57 | 0.834 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.6558 | 1.44 | 0.7879 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 1.03 | 1.35 | 0.3175 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elite consultations score, Jordan or Namibia?
- Jordan, at 1.38 against 1.35 in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in elite consultations score between Jordan and Namibia?
- 0.03, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Namibia?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Namibia rank globally for elite consultations score?
- Jordan ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 56th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Elite Consultations Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites consult other elites across the political spectrum and from relevant sectors of society and business when considering important policy changes.