Israel vs Namibia: Elite Consultations Score
Israel
1.32
in 2025
Namibia
1.35
in 2025
Israel rank
57th
Namibia rank
56th
Elite Consultations Score over time
- Israel
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 1.35 against 1.32 in Israel, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 98 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Namibia ahead.
Israel ranks 57th and Namibia ranks 56th of 176 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 7 and Namibia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -2.57 | -1.97 | 0.6039 | Namibia |
| 1910s | -1.53 | -1.97 | 0.4426 | Israel |
| 1940s | 0.426 | -1.39 | 1.81 | Israel |
| 1950s | 0.426 | -1.39 | 1.81 | Israel |
| 1960s | 0.5179 | -1.39 | 1.91 | Israel |
| 1970s | 0.7911 | -1.32 | 2.11 | Israel |
| 1980s | 1.32 | -0.625 | 1.95 | Israel |
| 1990s | 1.29 | 2.31 | 1.03 | Namibia |
| 2000s | 1.29 | 1.57 | 0.288 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 1.35 | 1.44 | 0.0962 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 1.71 | 1.35 | 0.3653 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elite consultations score, Israel or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 1.35 against 1.32 in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in elite consultations score between Israel and Namibia?
- 0.03, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Namibia?
- 98 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Namibia rank globally for elite consultations score?
- Israel ranks 57th and Namibia ranks 56th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Elite Consultations Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites consult other elites across the political spectrum and from relevant sectors of society and business when considering important policy changes.