Malawi vs Western Sahara: Electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables
Malawi
0.08 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Western Sahara
0.09 terawatt-hours
in 2009
Malawi rank
182nd
Western Sahara rank
180th
Electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables over time
- Malawi
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Western Sahara currently reports 0.09 terawatt-hours against 0.08 terawatt-hours in Malawi, a difference of 0.01 terawatt-hours.
That makes Western Sahara's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 182nd and Western Sahara ranks 180th of 208 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, Malawi or Western Sahara?
- Western Sahara, at 0.09 terawatt-hours against 0.08 terawatt-hours in Malawi as of 2009.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables between Malawi and Western Sahara?
- 0.01 terawatt-hours, with Western Sahara ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Western Sahara?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2009.
- How do Malawi and Western Sahara rank globally for electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables?
- Malawi ranks 182nd and Western Sahara ranks 180th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in terawatt-hours.