Guinea-Bissau vs Western Sahara: Electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables
Guinea-Bissau
0.08 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Western Sahara
0.09 terawatt-hours
in 2009
Guinea-Bissau rank
182nd
Western Sahara rank
180th
Electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Western Sahara currently reports 0.09 terawatt-hours against 0.08 terawatt-hours in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.01 terawatt-hours.
That makes Western Sahara's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Western Sahara has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 182nd and Western Sahara ranks 180th of 208 countries.
Western Sahara has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables, Guinea-Bissau or Western Sahara?
- Western Sahara, at 0.09 terawatt-hours against 0.08 terawatt-hours in Guinea-Bissau as of 2009.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables between Guinea-Bissau and Western Sahara?
- 0.01 terawatt-hours, with Western Sahara ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Western Sahara?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2009.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Western Sahara rank globally for electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 182nd and Western Sahara ranks 180th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from fossil fuels, nuclear and renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in terawatt-hours.