Chile vs Middle income: Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, female
Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, female over time
- Chile
- Middle income
How they compare
Chile currently reports 90.2% against 65.8% in Middle income, a difference of 24.4%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.4 times Middle income's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 16th and Middle income ranks 18th of 82 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 74.5% | 30.5% | 44.0% | Chile |
| 1990s | 80.9% | 36.0% | 44.9% | Chile |
| 2000s | 87.8% | 51.5% | 36.4% | Chile |
| 2010s | 88.9% | 59.5% | 29.3% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, female, Chile or Middle income?
- Chile, at 90.2% against 65.8% in Middle income as of 2017.
- What is the difference in elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, female between Chile and Middle income?
- 24.4%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Middle income?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Middle income rank globally for elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, female?
- Chile ranks 16th and Middle income ranks 18th of 82 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of females age 65 and above who can, with understanding, read and write a short, simple statement on their everyday life. Generally, ‘literacy’ also encompasses ‘numeracy’, the ability to make simple arithmetic calculations. This indicator is calculated by dividing the number of female literates aged 65 years and over by the corresponding age group population and multiplying the result by 100.