Luxembourg vs Macao: Egg production, per unit of GDP
Luxembourg
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Macao
0 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
186th
Macao rank
188th
Egg production, per unit of GDP over time
- Luxembourg
- Macao
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Macao, a difference of 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 2.8 times Macao's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Macao ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 186th and Macao ranks 188th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Macao in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Macao |
| 2010s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher egg production, per unit of gdp, Luxembourg or Macao?
- Luxembourg, at 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Macao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in egg production, per unit of gdp between Luxembourg and Macao?
- 0 tonnes per US$ of GDP, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Macao?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Macao rank globally for egg production, per unit of gdp?
- Luxembourg ranks 186th and Macao ranks 188th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Egg production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Egg production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.