South Sudan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods over time
- South Sudan
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.3 against 0.3 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
South Sudan ranks 174th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 174th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.275 | 0.225 | 0.05 | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.2875 | 0.3125 | 0.025 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 5.2: standards and methods, South Sudan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- South Sudan, at 0.3 against 0.3 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 5.2: standards and methods between South Sudan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for dimension 5.2: standards and methods?
- South Sudan ranks 174th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 174th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average score for Standards and Methods indicators. Internationally accepted and recommended methodology, classifications and standards provide the basis for national statistical offices (NSOs) on data integration, facilitating data exchange and providing the foundation for the preparation of relevant statistical indicators. The following methods and standards are considered: System of national accounts in use, National Accounts base year, Classification of national industry, CPI base year, Classification of household consumption, Classification of status of employment, Central government accounting status, Compilation of government finance statistics, Compilation of monetary and financial statistics, Business process. . Further work could improve the validity of this indicator and reduce the risk that countries may be incentivized to adopt only traditional standards and methods and neglect innovative solutions that may be more valid in the current context.