St. Kitts and Nevis vs Sweden: Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance
Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance over time
- St. Kitts and Nevis
- Sweden
How they compare
St. Kitts and Nevis currently reports 1 against 1 in Sweden, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 152 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | St. Kitts and Nevis | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | β |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 5.1: legislation and governance, St. Kitts and Nevis or Sweden?
- St. Kitts and Nevis, at 1 against 1 in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 5.1: legislation and governance between St. Kitts and Nevis and Sweden?
- 0, with St. Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for St. Kitts and Nevis and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do St. Kitts and Nevis and Sweden rank globally for dimension 5.1: legislation and governance?
- St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Included in dashboard, but not index because of insufficient country coverage. This indicator is based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Limited country coverage makes cross country comparison limited. A global database of statistical and data legislation and governance practice would be a valuable resource for capacity building in general not just for the SPI.