Moldova vs Paraguay: Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance
Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance over time
- Moldova
- Paraguay
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 1 against 1 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Moldova ahead.
Moldova ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 151 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Moldova |
| 2020s | 1 | 0.25 | 0.75 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 5.1: legislation and governance, Moldova or Paraguay?
- Moldova, at 1 against 1 in Paraguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 5.1: legislation and governance between Moldova and Paraguay?
- 0, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Paraguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Moldova and Paraguay rank globally for dimension 5.1: legislation and governance?
- Moldova ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Included in dashboard, but not index because of insufficient country coverage. This indicator is based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Limited country coverage makes cross country comparison limited. A global database of statistical and data legislation and governance practice would be a valuable resource for capacity building in general not just for the SPI.