Hong Kong (China) vs Mauritius: Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance
Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance over time
- Hong Kong (China)
- Mauritius
How they compare
Hong Kong (China) currently reports 1 against 1 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong (China) ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 152 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong (China) | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | β |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 5.1: legislation and governance, Hong Kong (China) or Mauritius?
- Hong Kong (China), at 1 against 1 in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 5.1: legislation and governance between Hong Kong (China) and Mauritius?
- 0, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Mauritius?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong (China) and Mauritius rank globally for dimension 5.1: legislation and governance?
- Hong Kong (China) ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Included in dashboard, but not index because of insufficient country coverage. This indicator is based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Limited country coverage makes cross country comparison limited. A global database of statistical and data legislation and governance practice would be a valuable resource for capacity building in general not just for the SPI.