Ecuador vs Sri Lanka: Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance
Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance over time
- Ecuador
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 against 0 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 132nd and Sri Lanka ranks 132nd of 151 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 5.1: legislation and governance, Ecuador or Sri Lanka?
- Ecuador, at 0 against 0 in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 5.1: legislation and governance between Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Sri Lanka rank globally for dimension 5.1: legislation and governance?
- Ecuador ranks 132nd and Sri Lanka ranks 132nd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Included in dashboard, but not index because of insufficient country coverage. This indicator is based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Limited country coverage makes cross country comparison limited. A global database of statistical and data legislation and governance practice would be a valuable resource for capacity building in general not just for the SPI.