Congo vs South Korea: Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance

Congo
1
in 2023
South Korea
1
in 2023
Congo rank
1st
South Korea rank
1st

Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance over time

  • Congo
  • South Korea
00.20.40.60.81200420132023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 1 against 1 in South Korea, a difference of 0.

Across all 5 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 151 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo South Korea Difference Ahead
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 5.1: legislation and governance, Congo or South Korea?
Congo, at 1 against 1 in South Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 5.1: legislation and governance between Congo and South Korea?
0, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Korea?
5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
How do Congo and South Korea rank globally for dimension 5.1: legislation and governance?
Congo ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
152 places, 1,285 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Included in dashboard, but not index because of insufficient country coverage. This indicator is based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Limited country coverage makes cross country comparison limited. A global database of statistical and data legislation and governance practice would be a valuable resource for capacity building in general not just for the SPI.