Austria vs Hong Kong, China: Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance
Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance over time
- Austria
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Austria currently reports 1 against 1 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 1st of 152 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | β |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 5.1: legislation and governance, Austria or Hong Kong, China?
- Austria, at 1 against 1 in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 5.1: legislation and governance between Austria and Hong Kong, China?
- 0, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Hong Kong, China?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Hong Kong, China rank globally for dimension 5.1: legislation and governance?
- Austria ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 1st of 152 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 5.1: Legislation and governance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Included in dashboard, but not index because of insufficient country coverage. This indicator is based on PARIS21 indicators on SDG 17.18.2 (national statistical legislation compliance with UN Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics), existence of National Statistical Council, national statistical strategy generation, national statistical plan. Limited country coverage makes cross country comparison limited. A global database of statistical and data legislation and governance practice would be a valuable resource for capacity building in general not just for the SPI.