Trinidad and Tobago vs Zimbabwe: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.063 against 0.042 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.021.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 177 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Trinidad and Tobago | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0215 | 0.2457 | 0.2243 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.0845 | 0.152 | 0.0675 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Trinidad and Tobago or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.063 against 0.042 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe?
- 0.021, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 166th and Zimbabwe ranks 163rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.