Slovakia vs Tanzania: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Slovakia
0.271
in 2023
Tanzania
0.274
in 2023
Slovakia rank
97th
Tanzania rank
94th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Slovakia
  • Tanzania
00.10.20.30.4201520192023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.274 against 0.271 in Slovakia, a difference of 0.003.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Slovakia ahead.

Slovakia ranks 97th and Tanzania ranks 94th of 177 countries.

Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovakia Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 0.3583 0.2117 0.1465 Slovakia
2020s 0.292 0.2425 0.0495 Slovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Slovakia or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 0.274 against 0.271 in Slovakia as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Slovakia and Tanzania?
0.003, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Tanzania?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Slovakia and Tanzania rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Slovakia ranks 97th and Tanzania ranks 94th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.