Portugal vs Tanzania: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Portugal
0.277
in 2023
Tanzania
0.274
in 2023
Portugal rank
91st
Tanzania rank
94th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Portugal
  • Tanzania
00.10.20.30.4201520192023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.277 against 0.274 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.003.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Portugal ahead.

Portugal ranks 91st and Tanzania ranks 94th of 177 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 0.271 0.2117 0.0593 Portugal
2020s 0.2425 0.2425 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Portugal or Tanzania?
Portugal, at 0.277 against 0.274 in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Portugal and Tanzania?
0.003, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Tanzania?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Portugal and Tanzania rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Portugal ranks 91st and Tanzania ranks 94th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.