Pakistan vs Switzerland: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Pakistan
0.355
in 2023
Switzerland
0.367
in 2023
Pakistan rank
52nd
Switzerland rank
49th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Pakistan
  • Switzerland
00.10.20.30.4201520192023

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 0.367 against 0.355 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.012.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 52nd and Switzerland ranks 49th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Switzerland Difference Ahead
2010s 0.3355 0.3307 0.0048 Pakistan
2020s 0.355 0.402 0.047 Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Pakistan or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 0.367 against 0.355 in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Pakistan and Switzerland?
0.012, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Switzerland?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Switzerland rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Pakistan ranks 52nd and Switzerland ranks 49th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.