Oman vs Slovenia: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Oman
0.355
in 2023
Slovenia
0.355
in 2023
Oman rank
52nd
Slovenia rank
52nd

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Oman
  • Slovenia
0.10.20.30.4201620192023

How they compare

Oman currently reports 0.355 against 0.355 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

Oman ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 52nd of 177 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Slovenia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.1785 0.2642 0.0857 Slovenia
2020s 0.355 0.358 0.003 Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Oman or Slovenia?
Oman, at 0.355 against 0.355 in Slovenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Oman and Slovenia?
0, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Slovenia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Oman and Slovenia rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Oman ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 52nd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.