Mongolia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time
- Mongolia
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.479 against 0.468 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.011.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 19th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 21st of 177 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.368 | 0.1752 | 0.1928 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.458 | 0.4435 | 0.0145 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Mongolia or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Mongolia, at 0.479 against 0.468 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Mongolia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.011, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Mongolia ranks 19th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 21st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.