Maldives vs Seychelles: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Maldives
0.453
in 2023
Seychelles
0.458
in 2023
Maldives rank
27th
Seychelles rank
25th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Maldives
  • Seychelles
00.20.40.6201520192023

How they compare

Seychelles currently reports 0.458 against 0.453 in Maldives, a difference of 0.005.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Seychelles ahead.

Maldives ranks 27th and Seychelles ranks 25th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Seychelles Difference Ahead
2010s 0.3743 0.394 0.0197 Seychelles
2020s 0.478 0.4495 0.0285 Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Maldives or Seychelles?
Seychelles, at 0.458 against 0.453 in Maldives as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Maldives and Seychelles?
0.005, with Seychelles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Seychelles?
7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do Maldives and Seychelles rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Maldives ranks 27th and Seychelles ranks 25th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.