Lithuania vs Nigeria: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Lithuania
0.343
in 2023
Nigeria
0.337
in 2023
Lithuania rank
56th
Nigeria rank
58th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Lithuania
  • Nigeria
00.20.40.6201520192023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.343 against 0.337 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.006.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 56th and Nigeria ranks 58th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Nigeria Difference Ahead
2010s 0.4265 0.33 0.0965 Lithuania
2020s 0.322 0.3415 0.0195 Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Lithuania or Nigeria?
Lithuania, at 0.343 against 0.337 in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Lithuania and Nigeria?
0.006, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Nigeria?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Nigeria rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Lithuania ranks 56th and Nigeria ranks 58th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.