Kyrgyzstan vs United Arab Emirates: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 0.401 against 0.398 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.003.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 38th and United Arab Emirates ranks 37th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3045 | 0.2417 | 0.0628 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 0.36 | 0.384 | 0.024 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Kyrgyzstan or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 0.401 against 0.398 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Kyrgyzstan and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.003, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and United Arab Emirates?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and United Arab Emirates rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 38th and United Arab Emirates ranks 37th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.