Kuwait vs Mauritius: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Kuwait
0.063
in 2023
Mauritius
0.042
in 2023
Kuwait rank
163rd
Mauritius rank
166th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Kuwait
  • Mauritius
0.050.10.150.20.25201520192023

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 0.063 against 0.042 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.021.

That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.5 times Mauritius's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.

Kuwait ranks 163rd and Mauritius ranks 166th of 177 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Mauritius Difference Ahead
2010s 0.1968 0.0922 0.1045 Kuwait
2020s 0.1265 0.0845 0.042 Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Kuwait or Mauritius?
Kuwait, at 0.063 against 0.042 in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Kuwait and Mauritius?
0.021, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Mauritius?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Kuwait and Mauritius rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Kuwait ranks 163rd and Mauritius ranks 166th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.