Kiribati vs Nigeria: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Kiribati
0.342
in 2023
Nigeria
0.337
in 2023
Kiribati rank
57th
Nigeria rank
58th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Kiribati
  • Nigeria
00.20.40.6201520192023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.342 against 0.337 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.005.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Nigeria ahead.

Kiribati ranks 57th and Nigeria ranks 58th of 177 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Nigeria Difference Ahead
2010s 0.023 0.3644 0.3414 Nigeria
2020s 0.182 0.3415 0.1595 Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Kiribati or Nigeria?
Kiribati, at 0.342 against 0.337 in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Kiribati and Nigeria?
0.005, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nigeria?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Nigeria rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Kiribati ranks 57th and Nigeria ranks 58th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.