Ireland vs Jamaica: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Ireland
0.148
in 2023
Jamaica
0.136
in 2023
Ireland rank
141st
Jamaica rank
143rd

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Ireland
  • Jamaica
00.10.20.3201520192023

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 0.148 against 0.136 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.012.

That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Ireland ahead.

Ireland ranks 141st and Jamaica ranks 143rd of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Jamaica Difference Ahead
2010s 0.1333 0.142 0.0088 Jamaica
2020s 0.2095 0.184 0.0255 Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Ireland or Jamaica?
Ireland, at 0.148 against 0.136 in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Ireland and Jamaica?
0.012, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Jamaica?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Ireland and Jamaica rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Ireland ranks 141st and Jamaica ranks 143rd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.