Indonesia vs Norway: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Indonesia
0.542
in 2023
Norway
0.554
in 2023
Indonesia rank
10th
Norway rank
8th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Indonesia
  • Norway
00.20.40.6201520192023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.554 against 0.542 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.012.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Norway ahead.

Indonesia ranks 10th and Norway ranks 8th of 177 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Norway Difference Ahead
2010s 0.33 0.462 0.132 Norway
2020s 0.444 0.5225 0.0785 Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Indonesia or Norway?
Norway, at 0.554 against 0.542 in Indonesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Indonesia and Norway?
0.012, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Norway?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Norway rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Indonesia ranks 10th and Norway ranks 8th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.