India vs Kiribati: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

India
0.346
in 2023
Kiribati
0.342
in 2023
India rank
55th
Kiribati rank
57th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • India
  • Kiribati
00.20.40.6201520192023

How they compare

India currently reports 0.346 against 0.342 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.004.

Across all 9 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.

India ranks 55th and Kiribati ranks 57th of 177 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Kiribati Difference Ahead
2010s 0.4272 0.023 0.4042 India
2020s 0.3565 0.182 0.1745 India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, India or Kiribati?
India, at 0.346 against 0.342 in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between India and Kiribati?
0.004, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Kiribati?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do India and Kiribati rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
India ranks 55th and Kiribati ranks 57th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.