Iceland vs Uganda: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time
- Iceland
- Uganda
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.105 against 0.105 in Uganda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Uganda ahead.
Iceland ranks 149th and Uganda ranks 149th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0377 | 0.0328 | 0.005 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.07 | 0.0885 | 0.0185 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Iceland or Uganda?
- Iceland, at 0.105 against 0.105 in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Iceland and Uganda?
- 0, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Uganda?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Uganda rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Iceland ranks 149th and Uganda ranks 149th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.