Iceland vs Qatar: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Iceland
0.105
in 2023
Qatar
0.105
in 2023
Iceland rank
149th
Qatar rank
149th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Iceland
  • Qatar
00.050.10.15201620192023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.105 against 0.105 in Qatar, a difference of 0.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 149th and Qatar ranks 149th of 177 countries.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Qatar Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0377 0.1343 0.0965 Qatar
2020s 0.07 0.0735 0.0035 Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Iceland or Qatar?
Iceland, at 0.105 against 0.105 in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Iceland and Qatar?
0, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Qatar?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Qatar rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Iceland ranks 149th and Qatar ranks 149th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.