Guinea vs South Africa: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Guinea
0.295
in 2023
South Africa
0.301
in 2023
Guinea rank
79th
South Africa rank
77th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Guinea
  • South Africa
00.10.20.3201520192023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.301 against 0.295 in Guinea, a difference of 0.006.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was South Africa ahead.

Guinea ranks 79th and South Africa ranks 77th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea South Africa Difference Ahead
2010s 0.2026 0.291 0.0884 South Africa
2020s 0.2995 0.2395 0.06 Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Guinea or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0.301 against 0.295 in Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Guinea and South Africa?
0.006, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and South Africa?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Guinea and South Africa rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Guinea ranks 79th and South Africa ranks 77th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.