Ghana vs Netherlands: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Ghana
0.419
in 2023
Netherlands
0.411
in 2023
Ghana rank
32nd
Netherlands rank
34th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Ghana
  • Netherlands
0.10.20.30.4201520192023

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 0.419 against 0.411 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.008.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Ghana ahead.

Ghana ranks 32nd and Netherlands ranks 34th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Netherlands Difference Ahead
2010s 0.2908 0.2675 0.0232 Ghana
2020s 0.351 0.411 0.06 Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Ghana or Netherlands?
Ghana, at 0.419 against 0.411 in Netherlands as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Ghana and Netherlands?
0.008, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Netherlands?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Ghana and Netherlands rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Ghana ranks 32nd and Netherlands ranks 34th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.