Eswatini vs Tajikistan: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time
- Eswatini
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 0.084 against 0.072 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.012.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Eswatini ranks 160th and Tajikistan ranks 157th of 177 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.05 | 0.0648 | 0.0148 | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 0.036 | 0.0945 | 0.0585 | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Eswatini or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 0.084 against 0.072 in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Eswatini and Tajikistan?
- 0.012, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tajikistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Tajikistan rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Eswatini ranks 160th and Tajikistan ranks 157th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.