El Salvador vs New Zealand: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

El Salvador
0.136
in 2023
New Zealand
0.136
in 2023
El Salvador rank
143rd
New Zealand rank
143rd

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • El Salvador
  • New Zealand
0.050.10.150.2201520192023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.136 against 0.136 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was New Zealand ahead.

El Salvador ranks 143rd and New Zealand ranks 143rd of 177 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador New Zealand Difference Ahead
2010s 0.1018 0.1163 0.0145 New Zealand
2020s 0.125 0.1675 0.0425 New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, El Salvador or New Zealand?
El Salvador, at 0.136 against 0.136 in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between El Salvador and New Zealand?
0, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and New Zealand?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and New Zealand rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
El Salvador ranks 143rd and New Zealand ranks 143rd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.