Czechia vs Kazakhstan: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Czechia
0.509
in 2023
Kazakhstan
0.5
in 2023
Czechia rank
14th
Kazakhstan rank
16th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Czechia
  • Kazakhstan
00.20.40.6201520192023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 0.509 against 0.5 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.009.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 14th and Kazakhstan ranks 16th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.447 0.4133 0.0338 Czechia
2020s 0.509 0.5105 0.0015 Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Czechia or Kazakhstan?
Czechia, at 0.509 against 0.5 in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Czechia and Kazakhstan?
0.009, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Kazakhstan?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Kazakhstan rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Czechia ranks 14th and Kazakhstan ranks 16th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.