Cuba vs United Arab Emirates: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time
- Cuba
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.407 against 0.401 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.006.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Cuba ranks 36th and United Arab Emirates ranks 37th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1825 | 0.2417 | 0.0592 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2020s | 0.4015 | 0.384 | 0.0175 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Cuba or United Arab Emirates?
- Cuba, at 0.407 against 0.401 in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Cuba and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.006, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and United Arab Emirates?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and United Arab Emirates rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Cuba ranks 36th and United Arab Emirates ranks 37th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.