Croatia vs Uruguay: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time
- Croatia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.139 against 0.136 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.003.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 145th and Uruguay ranks 146th of 180 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0635 | 0.1263 | 0.0628 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.1215 | 0.1465 | 0.025 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Croatia or Uruguay?
- Croatia, at 0.139 against 0.136 in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Croatia and Uruguay?
- 0.003, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Uruguay rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Croatia ranks 145th and Uruguay ranks 146th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.