Croatia vs Ireland: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Croatia
0.139
in 2023
Ireland
0.148
in 2023
Croatia rank
142nd
Ireland rank
141st

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Croatia
  • Ireland
00.050.10.150.20.25201620192023

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 0.148 against 0.139 in Croatia, a difference of 0.009.

That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 142nd and Ireland ranks 141st of 177 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Ireland Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0635 0.1333 0.0698 Ireland
2020s 0.1215 0.2095 0.088 Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Croatia or Ireland?
Ireland, at 0.148 against 0.139 in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Croatia and Ireland?
0.009, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Ireland?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Ireland rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Croatia ranks 142nd and Ireland ranks 141st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.