Congo vs Sudan: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time
- Congo
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.186 against 0.178 in Congo, a difference of 0.008.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 132nd and Sudan ranks 131st of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2698 | 0.1844 | 0.0854 | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.178 | 0.186 | 0.008 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Congo or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0.186 against 0.178 in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Congo and Sudan?
- 0.008, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Sudan rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Congo ranks 132nd and Sudan ranks 131st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.