China vs Malawi: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

China
0.331
in 2023
Malawi
0.327
in 2023
China rank
63rd
Malawi rank
64th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • China
  • Malawi
0.20.40.60.8201520192023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.331 against 0.327 in Malawi, a difference of 0.004.

Across all 9 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 63rd and Malawi ranks 64th of 177 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Malawi Difference Ahead
2010s 0.432 0.2302 0.2018 China
2020s 0.331 0.314 0.017 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, China or Malawi?
China, at 0.331 against 0.327 in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between China and Malawi?
0.004, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Malawi?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do China and Malawi rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
China ranks 63rd and Malawi ranks 64th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.