Canada vs Denmark: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time
- Canada
- Denmark
How they compare
Canada currently reports 0.593 against 0.55 in Denmark, a difference of 0.043.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 6th and Denmark ranks 9th of 180 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.6152 | 0.4295 | 0.1857 | Canada |
| 2020s | 0.6035 | 0.567 | 0.0365 | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Canada or Denmark?
- Canada, at 0.593 against 0.55 in Denmark as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Canada and Denmark?
- 0.043, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Denmark?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Denmark rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Canada ranks 6th and Denmark ranks 9th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.