Cambodia vs Congo: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time
- Cambodia
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.178 against 0.169 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.009.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Congo ahead.
Cambodia ranks 134th and Congo ranks 132nd of 177 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1878 | 0.2698 | 0.082 | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.116 | 0.178 | 0.062 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Cambodia or Congo?
- Congo, at 0.178 against 0.169 in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Cambodia and Congo?
- 0.009, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Congo?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Congo rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Cambodia ranks 134th and Congo ranks 132nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.