Botswana vs Syria: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Botswana
0.178
in 2023
Syria
0.166
in 2023
Botswana rank
132nd
Syria rank
135th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Botswana
  • Syria
0.050.10.150.2201520192023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.178 against 0.166 in Syria, a difference of 0.012.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Syria's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Syria ahead.

Botswana ranks 132nd and Syria ranks 135th of 177 countries.

Syria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Syria Difference Ahead
2010s 0.112 0.13 0.018 Syria
2020s 0.1205 0.172 0.0515 Syria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Botswana or Syria?
Botswana, at 0.178 against 0.166 in Syria as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Botswana and Syria?
0.012, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Syria?
7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Syria rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Botswana ranks 132nd and Syria ranks 135th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.