Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kosovo: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kosovo
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.247 against 0.243 in Kosovo, a difference of 0.004.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Kosovo ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 111th and Kosovo ranks 112th of 180 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0368 | 0.1926 | 0.1558 | Kosovo |
| 2020s | 0.2725 | 0.2775 | 0.005 | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kosovo?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.247 against 0.243 in Kosovo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo?
- 0.004, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 111th and Kosovo ranks 112th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.