Benin vs Micronesia (country): Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time
- Benin
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 0.254 against 0.253 in Benin, a difference of 0.001.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 104th and Micronesia (country) ranks 103rd of 177 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1402 | 0.2706 | 0.1304 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2020s | 0.226 | 0.288 | 0.062 | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Benin or Micronesia (country)?
- Micronesia (country), at 0.254 against 0.253 in Benin as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Benin and Micronesia (country)?
- 0.001, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Micronesia (country)?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Benin and Micronesia (country) rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Benin ranks 104th and Micronesia (country) ranks 103rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.