Belarus vs Cuba: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Belarus
0.416
in 2023
Cuba
0.407
in 2023
Belarus rank
33rd
Cuba rank
36th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Belarus
  • Cuba
0.20.30.40.5201520192023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.416 against 0.407 in Cuba, a difference of 0.009.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Cuba ahead.

Belarus ranks 33rd and Cuba ranks 36th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Cuba Difference Ahead
2010s 0.3064 0.2468 0.0596 Belarus
2020s 0.3645 0.4015 0.037 Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Belarus or Cuba?
Belarus, at 0.416 against 0.407 in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Belarus and Cuba?
0.009, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Cuba?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Cuba rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Belarus ranks 33rd and Cuba ranks 36th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.