Bahrain vs West Bank and Gaza: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time
- Bahrain
- West Bank and Gaza
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 0.512 against 0.509 in West Bank and Gaza, a difference of 0.003.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Bahrain ahead.
Bahrain ranks 12th and West Bank and Gaza ranks 14th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 1 and West Bank and Gaza in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | West Bank and Gaza | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.422 | 0.3192 | 0.1028 | Bahrain |
| 2020s | 0.515 | 0.5255 | 0.0105 | West Bank and Gaza |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Bahrain or West Bank and Gaza?
- Bahrain, at 0.512 against 0.509 in West Bank and Gaza as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Bahrain and West Bank and Gaza?
- 0.003, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and West Bank and Gaza?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Bahrain and West Bank and Gaza rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
- Bahrain ranks 12th and West Bank and Gaza ranks 14th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.