Bahrain vs Czechia: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Bahrain
0.512
in 2023
Czechia
0.509
in 2023
Bahrain rank
12th
Czechia rank
14th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Bahrain
  • Czechia
00.20.40.6201620192023

How they compare

Bahrain currently reports 0.512 against 0.509 in Czechia, a difference of 0.003.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Czechia ahead.

Bahrain ranks 12th and Czechia ranks 14th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 1 and Czechia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain Czechia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.422 0.447 0.025 Czechia
2020s 0.515 0.509 0.006 Bahrain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Bahrain or Czechia?
Bahrain, at 0.512 against 0.509 in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Bahrain and Czechia?
0.003, with Bahrain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Czechia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Bahrain and Czechia rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Bahrain ranks 12th and Czechia ranks 14th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.